Saturday, June 25, 2011
USDA Agent Sarah Conant's Hidden Agenda Exposed in the John Dollarhite Rabbit Story
In case you haven't heard, there has been no resolution in the Dollarhite rabbit saga. John Dollarhite is the Nixa, Missouri man who bought his son two rabbits to teach him responsibility, and the hobby soon began supplying rabbits to the Branson popular theme park Silver Dollar City. And now the USDA is asking the Dollarhites to give up their Constitutional rights in exchange for the fines to be dropped providing they play along with the USDA's deman.
Since I broke the story, Bob McCarty helped the story go viral to attract national outrage, and the story even reached the Rush Limbaugh show. The USDA decided to negotiate a settlement and was granted permission to inspect the Dollarhite's land for rabbits. Of course, the Dollarhites got out of the bunny rabbit business long before the story broke.
A week after the inspection, the USDA sent the following letter to the Dollarhites. As you read the letter you will see it clearly asks the Dollarhites to surrender the Constitutional rights by granting the USDA jurisdiction, which they clearly don't have since the Dollarhites never engaged in interstate commerce.
John Dollarhite USDA Settlement Offer
Thanks to a follow up story on Andrew Breitbart's Big Government today, there appears to be a hidden agenda of another bureaucrat pushing their weight around at the USDA. She also signed the first letter to the Dollarhites demanding $90,634 dollars from the Missouri family. Here's what one Bretibart reader discovered about Sarah Conant, who signed the letter to the Dollarhites:
JPB999 writes:
I went back to the original story, where the Dollarhites had received the shakedown letter from the USDA. It was signed by a "Sarah Conant". A quick google of this individual traces her back to the University of Virginia Law School, where she founded the Virginia Animal Law Society, which is affiliated with the Animal Legal Defense fund. When you check out the Animal Legal Defense Fund, particularly their blog, you will note that these folks are crusaders, determined not just to protect animals from cruelty, but to prevent them from being used as food.
In other words, there is a strong possibility that this is being driven by an animus against traditionally accepted animal husbandry and commerce. The vigilance and heavy-handed methods applied seem to bear this out. Their expressed purpose of trying to get the Dollarhites out of this business, with the threats they have made, seems to bear this out.
Interesting indeed. It sounds like PETA and groups like it have managed to infiltrate the USDA to push their agenda on Americans. Clearly, that does seem like it may be the hidden agenda that attracts USDA agent Sarah Conant's attention to the Dollarhite's rabbit hobby. When it comes to radicals like Conant who put animal rights before American rights, you can see clearly why the Dollarhites were told they were going to be made an example of by the USDA.
Since I broke the story, Bob McCarty helped the story go viral to attract national outrage, and the story even reached the Rush Limbaugh show. The USDA decided to negotiate a settlement and was granted permission to inspect the Dollarhite's land for rabbits. Of course, the Dollarhites got out of the bunny rabbit business long before the story broke.
A week after the inspection, the USDA sent the following letter to the Dollarhites. As you read the letter you will see it clearly asks the Dollarhites to surrender the Constitutional rights by granting the USDA jurisdiction, which they clearly don't have since the Dollarhites never engaged in interstate commerce.
John Dollarhite USDA Settlement Offer
Thanks to a follow up story on Andrew Breitbart's Big Government today, there appears to be a hidden agenda of another bureaucrat pushing their weight around at the USDA. She also signed the first letter to the Dollarhites demanding $90,634 dollars from the Missouri family. Here's what one Bretibart reader discovered about Sarah Conant, who signed the letter to the Dollarhites:
JPB999 writes:
I went back to the original story, where the Dollarhites had received the shakedown letter from the USDA. It was signed by a "Sarah Conant". A quick google of this individual traces her back to the University of Virginia Law School, where she founded the Virginia Animal Law Society, which is affiliated with the Animal Legal Defense fund. When you check out the Animal Legal Defense Fund, particularly their blog, you will note that these folks are crusaders, determined not just to protect animals from cruelty, but to prevent them from being used as food.
In other words, there is a strong possibility that this is being driven by an animus against traditionally accepted animal husbandry and commerce. The vigilance and heavy-handed methods applied seem to bear this out. Their expressed purpose of trying to get the Dollarhites out of this business, with the threats they have made, seems to bear this out.
Interesting indeed. It sounds like PETA and groups like it have managed to infiltrate the USDA to push their agenda on Americans. Clearly, that does seem like it may be the hidden agenda that attracts USDA agent Sarah Conant's attention to the Dollarhite's rabbit hobby. When it comes to radicals like Conant who put animal rights before American rights, you can see clearly why the Dollarhites were told they were going to be made an example of by the USDA.
Posted by
Bungalow Bill
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Clay, I am proud to have made your acquaintance, and also know you are a committed patriot who's not just messin' around! Thank you!" - Doug Burlison, Springfield, MO City Councilman
Bungalow Bill's Conservative Wisdom: As featured on Politico, The Daily Paul, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Drudge Report, Breitbart Big Government, Michael Savage, Western Front America, Newsmax, KY3, KSPR 33, KOLR 10, Alan Keyes is Loyal to Liberty, Lucianne, Infowars,Prison Planet, Speigel, Willie Nelson.com, Vincent David Jericho, Nick Reed, Truth About IB, and David Icke.com.
What's Right
-
Talk Radio Appearances Set Tonight and Sunday47 minutes ago
-
Prayers For The Victims4 hours ago
-
-
-
-
An Honest Scientist!1 day ago
-
Another program gone while1 day ago
-
What the Hell America1 day ago
-
-
-
-
-
When Will The SHTF In The USA9 months ago
-
-
Blog Archive
- May 2013 (13)
- April 2013 (20)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (120)
- January 2013 (178)
- December 2012 (136)
- November 2012 (119)
- October 2012 (158)
- September 2012 (263)
- August 2012 (288)
- July 2012 (138)
- June 2012 (209)
- May 2012 (197)
- April 2012 (192)
- March 2012 (198)
- February 2012 (196)
- January 2012 (221)
- December 2011 (243)
- November 2011 (223)
- October 2011 (84)
- September 2011 (17)
- August 2011 (187)
- July 2011 (464)
- June 2011 (587)
- May 2011 (888)
- April 2011 (441)
- March 2011 (340)
- February 2011 (392)
- January 2011 (361)
- December 2010 (431)
- November 2010 (706)
- October 2010 (658)
- September 2010 (560)
- August 2010 (300)
- July 2010 (96)
- June 2010 (105)
- May 2010 (304)
- April 2010 (565)
- March 2010 (626)
- February 2010 (564)
- January 2010 (779)
- December 2009 (550)
- November 2009 (433)
- October 2009 (256)
- September 2009 (367)
- August 2009 (430)
- July 2009 (317)
- June 2009 (342)
- May 2009 (349)
- April 2009 (363)
- March 2009 (374)
- February 2009 (296)
- January 2009 (302)
- December 2008 (176)
- November 2008 (111)
- October 2008 (30)


In some cases, the USDA or other government agencies have HIRED known animal rights people, like the hiring of Dr. Susan Leiberman, ex-VP of HSUS, for a lead position in the USFWS where she proceeded to work on regulations which ultimately prohibited the import of exotic birds into the US...she was adamantly against importing, even though professional societies not associated with the bird industry were not against such imports.
ReplyDeleteI stand with the Dollarhites, and believe this office of USDA should be defunded. As I understand it, the Dollarhites were not engaged in interstate commerce, and thus the entire issue is not within the purview of the Federal government. Any law the USDA is using in either not applicable or is non-Constitutional.
ReplyDeleteAnd considering the penalties attempting to be imposed on what is basically a private family who profited a few thousand dollars, the individuals of the USDA responsible should also no longer be part of the Federal enforcement apparatus, for they seem to lack the discretion I would want in someone with the power to destroy lives. In fact, it would probably be best if they left governmental service altogether, for they appear to lack judgment.
To reiterate, I contest the authority of the USDA to act in this matter to start with, and believe the appropriate phrase is that they were acting under the "color of authority"--not actual authority, the Dollarhites having been engages in intrastate commerce. The USDA has overreached, continues to overreach, and it is only fair to point out that those who wish to play hardball better be sure they are the only ones able to throw pitches--both now, and in the future. Regardless of what happens with the Dollarhites, the actions of the USDA will not be forgotten, for these actions are a threat to the system of federalism and cannot be allowed to stand (either today or in the future).
The USDA better be sure that its friends will always be winning elections, and that its foes never can. That naturally being impossible to insure, it may wish to change course, and to do so immediately.
I dare Sarah Conant to come up with one Federalist Paper that declares that animals have rights and the federal government has a duty to defend those rights.
ReplyDeleteShe probably loves animals because men don't love Sarah. I bet she has lots of cats.
ReplyDeleteDear Sarah,
ReplyDeleteYour own personal crusade doesn't equate to the Supreme Law of the Land. So you believe in animal rights, but your problem is the Constitution doesn't grant animals rights. It does, however, grant the Dollarhites Constitutional rights, which you seem intent on trampling on. That makes you a tyrant Ms. Conant. You should be shown the door at the USDA for not defending the Constitution before putting your own personal beliefs first. You are a disgrace of an American, and karma will be a real bitch for you for trampling on Americans rights while you push your animal rights agenda.
IF Sarah is so concerned about Animal Rights, WHY doesn't she stick her nose in the BLM"S butt? They (BLM) are busy destroying the WILD horses & Burros lives, that DO have protection & rights. But the BLM prefers to cater to Ranchers & Corporations which have $$... Wild Horses do not.
ReplyDeleteHey, you tell them to stand up for their rights and to reject a letter that lets them off without any fines. I'm sure the judge will be just tickled to let them know what he thinks of their understanding of Constitutional law when he slams them with fines.
ReplyDelete@burningbird it appears the USDA doubts their power over the Dollarhites. Why else would they be asking for permission of jurisdiction? The Dollarhites have a huge weight on their shoulders but this could set precedence over future cases.
ReplyDeleteHer signature makes her last name look like that nasty four-letter "c" word.
ReplyDeleteI worry that going after those who raise rabbits is just the tip of the iceberg which is coming.
ReplyDeleteOne has to ask just how deeply the animal rights crusaders have infiltrated into the USDA?
http://www.dcbar.org/for_lawyers/sections/environment_energy_and_natural_resources/committee.cfm
ReplyDeleteSarah L. Conant, Vice Chair
The Humane Society of the United States
2100 L Street NW
Washington, DC 20037
Who hired someone with an animal rights agenda to the USDA?! This is nuts!
What a joke the USDA and other government bureaucracies have become. Unfortunately, it is NOT funny.
ReplyDeleteI guess families raising rabbits to sell is Sarah's "pet peeve"!!!
None of you are familiar with any of the consent letters from the USDA. This is, more or less, a form letter. Other consent letters have the same text. The only thing changed is the specifics related to the case.
ReplyDeleteNone of you is familiar with how any of this works. These people got off without any fine. What the heck more do they want? A song? Gold foil starts on the letter?
I'm assuming the Dollarhites' lawyer is competent, because he'll tell them to shut up, sign the agreement, and to move on.
If not, they'll soon find out that the these kinds of enforcements have been happening for decades, and judge's don't like the government's time wasted by people who take the advice of online pundits over actual lawyers.
funny to see "burning bird " here.. Sarah Conant is a former HSUS operative.. burning bird is an HSUS supporter and long time HSUS pro poster.. for those who care.. forget about PETA.. HSUS is the evil demon in this play six degrees of separation will take you back to HSUS with Conant and Sunstein.. and more..connect the animal rights dots.. note that the stipulation calls for no animals owned that are not 'spayed or neutered", a common call of the HSUS to end animal ownership..
ReplyDelete@burningbird granting powers to the government they don't Constitutionally have never seems like a good idea to me. I bet you can't show me where in the Constitution the USDA has this authority, using the Federalist Papers as a reference of course.
ReplyDelete@burning bird.. sometimes it is more about liberty than money but you would not know that coming from the animal rights platform that you stand for.. right next to Wayne Pacelle .. funny thing that.. you complained it was "all about the money" when Prop 2 was on the HSUS million dollars supported table.. but can't see the forest for the trees here.. how would you like it if you had to sing something that said you could not have another natural animal for the rest of your life. When"form letters " deny citizens their rights it is time to stop and take a hard look at laws. and those that make them..
ReplyDeletesorry SIGN something
ReplyDeletehere is what "burning bird" aka Shelly Powers pro HSUS supporter and animal rights groupie says about the Dollarhites:
ReplyDeleteShelley Powers
Not..... but just as stupid. These people can't seem to understand that they got they wanted -- the Dollarhites won't have to pay a penny in fines.
I think the Dollarhites should reject this deal. They should face a judge who will slam them with thousands in fines.
there .. you have in her own words.. Shelly Powers wants the Dollarhites to face millions in fines..to her it is "fitting PUNISHMENT" for what her friend says:
"Selling to Petland and shady petting zoos? That place looks like a rabbit mill."
hear that folks .. operating a"rabbit mill" because they sold a few rabbits to petting zoos (shady ones no less!)
Burning bird is an animal rights person..the only
"Constitution" she knows or cares about is the one that gives animals more rights than humans
Did anyone else notice the man(purple shirt,metal clipboard,no hat) in the video identified himself as a,"veterinary medical officer" out of Arkansas.
ReplyDeleteWhen asked if he was employed by the USDA he gave a vague response.
Questions;
1)What did he mean by using the term,"officer"?
2)How is he being compensated and by whom?
3)Is his position being funded by donations from the Humane Society?
4)Is the USDA bringing on 6 more "investigatory officers" to Missouri courtesy of donation funding by the Humane Society?
Just wondering......
Why is this woman still in office. Because Obama hired Cass Sunstein the leader of the animal rights movement. These people must go! human Rights not animal rights. This is war.
ReplyDeleteWhy is this woman still in this office. Why is no one picketing her? Because our president has as our regulatory czar Cass Sunstein the animal rights leader. Get these people out of office before this cult takes over!,,
ReplyDeleteThe USDA is (One of) the most corrupt Federal Agencies. We must demand they defund this division APHIS and lock up Sarah, Throw Shelly Powers in with her.
ReplyDeleteThe cunning Sarah Conant's signature makes her last name look like that nasty four letter c word. Coincidence?
ReplyDelete