Wednesday, December 29, 2010
Does Birth Photography Violate Privacy Laws?: Meritus Medical Center Bans Baby Delivery Photography
I know I have felt violated by that crazy aunt who feels the need to put the video camera in your face that one time of year when finally decide to get together--Christmas. You cover your head and try to avoid the video camera as they call out your name to embarrass you until you finally give in. Have you been there?
However, I have a real problem with Meritus Medical Center's, in Hagerstown, Maryland, new policy on cameras in the delivery room. The birth of a new baby is a special time for most parents, and they have banned all cameras from the delivery room and they are claiming it is to protect privacy rights. Privacy rights? Of who?
Meritus Medical Center implemented a policy prohibiting video, film and still photography of deliveries until five minutes after birth. The change is intended to protect patient privacy and reduce potential staff distractions, said Jody Bishop, administrative director of the department that includes the hospital's birthing center.
"Five minutes after the birth, if everybody's well and the physician approves, they can go ahead and start videotaping and taking pictures," Bishop told The (Hagerstown) Herald-Mail.
Privacy rights? Where do they get off on saying this newborn baby has privacy rights from its parents? There are no privacy rights when it comes to changing the diaper, either the parents expose the baby to clean it up or the baby will suffer consequences that will lead to its death. If anything, the parents have the right to privacy from the hospital, the public, and of course the state, which means these entities have no right to interfere with the parent's upbringing of this child under normal circumstances, but what is this idea this baby has privacy rights from its own parents?
Think about that and this story should anger you. I understand the male parent should be in a position that doesn't interfere with the medical staff, but to state a new born child or any child under the age of 18 has rights that prevent them from having access to the child is just scary the hospital would even think this way.
As well, you never get those first rare moments of life back. That first second, first minute of life. It is gone so quickly, and the hospital is violating the parents rights for not letting them enjoy it without this idiotic notion that babies have the right of privacy from their parents.
However, I have a real problem with Meritus Medical Center's, in Hagerstown, Maryland, new policy on cameras in the delivery room. The birth of a new baby is a special time for most parents, and they have banned all cameras from the delivery room and they are claiming it is to protect privacy rights. Privacy rights? Of who?
Meritus Medical Center implemented a policy prohibiting video, film and still photography of deliveries until five minutes after birth. The change is intended to protect patient privacy and reduce potential staff distractions, said Jody Bishop, administrative director of the department that includes the hospital's birthing center.
"Five minutes after the birth, if everybody's well and the physician approves, they can go ahead and start videotaping and taking pictures," Bishop told The (Hagerstown) Herald-Mail.
Privacy rights? Where do they get off on saying this newborn baby has privacy rights from its parents? There are no privacy rights when it comes to changing the diaper, either the parents expose the baby to clean it up or the baby will suffer consequences that will lead to its death. If anything, the parents have the right to privacy from the hospital, the public, and of course the state, which means these entities have no right to interfere with the parent's upbringing of this child under normal circumstances, but what is this idea this baby has privacy rights from its own parents?
Think about that and this story should anger you. I understand the male parent should be in a position that doesn't interfere with the medical staff, but to state a new born child or any child under the age of 18 has rights that prevent them from having access to the child is just scary the hospital would even think this way.
As well, you never get those first rare moments of life back. That first second, first minute of life. It is gone so quickly, and the hospital is violating the parents rights for not letting them enjoy it without this idiotic notion that babies have the right of privacy from their parents.
Posted by
Bungalow Bill
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Clay, I am proud to have made your acquaintance, and also know you are a committed patriot who's not just messin' around! Thank you!" - Doug Burlison, Springfield, MO City Councilman
Bungalow Bill's Conservative Wisdom: As featured on Politico, The Daily Paul, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Drudge Report, Breitbart Big Government, Michael Savage, Western Front America, Newsmax, KY3, KSPR 33, KOLR 10, Alan Keyes is Loyal to Liberty, Lucianne, Infowars,Prison Planet, Speigel, Willie Nelson.com, Vincent David Jericho, Nick Reed, Truth About IB, and David Icke.com.
What's Right
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
An Honest Scientist!3 days ago
-
Another program gone while3 days ago
-
What the Hell America4 days ago
-
-
-
-
When Will The SHTF In The USA10 months ago
-
-
Blog Archive
- May 2013 (14)
- April 2013 (20)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (120)
- January 2013 (178)
- December 2012 (136)
- November 2012 (119)
- October 2012 (158)
- September 2012 (263)
- August 2012 (288)
- July 2012 (138)
- June 2012 (209)
- May 2012 (197)
- April 2012 (192)
- March 2012 (198)
- February 2012 (196)
- January 2012 (221)
- December 2011 (243)
- November 2011 (223)
- October 2011 (84)
- September 2011 (17)
- August 2011 (187)
- July 2011 (464)
- June 2011 (587)
- May 2011 (888)
- April 2011 (441)
- March 2011 (340)
- February 2011 (392)
- January 2011 (361)
- December 2010 (431)
- November 2010 (706)
- October 2010 (658)
- September 2010 (560)
- August 2010 (300)
- July 2010 (96)
- June 2010 (105)
- May 2010 (304)
- April 2010 (565)
- March 2010 (626)
- February 2010 (564)
- January 2010 (779)
- December 2009 (550)
- November 2009 (433)
- October 2009 (256)
- September 2009 (367)
- August 2009 (430)
- July 2009 (317)
- June 2009 (342)
- May 2009 (349)
- April 2009 (363)
- March 2009 (374)
- February 2009 (296)
- January 2009 (302)
- December 2008 (176)
- November 2008 (111)
- October 2008 (30)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Sorry about the captcha. I hate them just like you, but the spambots have gotten ridiculous.