Sunday, July 25, 2010
More Bloggers Questioning Billy Long's Abilities to Lead Southwest Missouri in Congress
Billy Long opened up the door for more questions about his leadership ability and his knowledge of issues when he failed to answer a question about the war in Afghanistan declaring he didn't have a grasp on the issue. I hope Long does know it's the job of Congress to declare war, so he should at least know something about our troops and where they are fighting.
As Billy Long left the last round of big debates before the August primary, more and more people began asking the question. Is Billy Long qualified. More blogs came out examining if Billy Long is truly the best choice in Missouri 7. Many of those bloggers figured it out very quickly. Billy Long doesn't have the knowledge on issues and is not prepared to go to Congress even after more than a year and a half running for the job.
Anson Burlingame writes, Now for our prospective “citizen legislator”, Billy Long. That is the key point of his campaign that I have heard that sets him aside from his main opponents. He calls for term limited business men to represent us in Congress. That is not a bad idea in my mind IF those business men have a deep and abiding knowledge of government both at the levels of principles as well as specifics.
Billy has not shown me such knowledge. I won’t challenge him on his attempt to bring in new blood with an honest attempt to make a difference. But as such “new blood” there are some basic ingredients needed to sustain life, in this case the life of legislation for the good of all Americans, not just businessmen.
I also wonder exactly what political machine is behind Billy and how he got so much money to run the “richest” of the 8 campaigns for this seat. Not challenging him ethically, just wondering. I sent his headquarters an email asking to speak with someone on that and other issues and they have not bothered to get back in touch. Guess Joplin takes a back seat to his more important campaign in Springfield which is a political calculation that is his right to make.
Hey Anson, does it really set him apart considering Mike Moon, Jeff Wisdom, and Michael Wardell have never sat in an elected office either? It's funny that Billy Long's headquarters are keeping hush they are using James Harris and Jeff Roe to run their campaign. Jeff Roe loves to get dirty in races going as far as digging through garbage of political opponents as written many times on the internet. As for the "richest" of the campaign, Billy Long looks more like a career politician not only because of Roe and Harris, but also because he plays the same big money politics Americans are sick of.
In the first couple months of Long is Wrong, I also examined how weak and how contradictory Billy Long's actions have been on helping get a fairer tax system in the United States. Now Straight Up American makes many of the same points only to leave out Long's campaign contributions to candidates who wish to kill the Fair Tax like the Springfield mayor. Here's what Straight Up American writes:
Billy Long seems to be leading the pack of the Republican candidates so I decided to take a look at his position first. Mr. Long seems like a strong candidate in most respects, but unfortunately when it comes to the FairTax his position is a little weak and muddled. In his ads online and in print he indicates that he is in favor of “Fair Tax” (with the space between the two words). There’s a big difference between “Fair Tax” and the FairTax plan. Everyone claims to be in favor of “Fair Tax.” That is not specific support of the FairTax plan. In fact, Mr. Long’s stance on the issue of taxes states, “Billy is open to either a flat tax or a fair tax as a way to fix our tax system.”
This is like saying, “I’d be happy to take more poison or the antidote as a way to recovery.” The tax on income is the fundamental problem, and no amount of tinkering with it is going to fix it. Mr. Long’s openness to a flat tax indicates that he either doesn’t truly understand the problem, or he wants to ride the wave of support for the FairTax into a Congressional office.
I placed a call to the offices of ‘Billy Long for Congress’ to confirm his position on the issue, and was told that although his first choice would be the FairTax he is also open to a flat tax on income because of the difficulty of getting the FairTax passed. I’m sorry, but this is exactly the kind of wishy-washy stance we do not need in Washington.
There is no ‘either, or’ in the issue of tax reform. This Country will crumble under the weight and corruption of the income tax system, and we need representatives that understand that and are eager to fight for a new future. Accepting more of the same just because something is better than nothing isn’t going to cut it any longer. The only solution to our Country’s fiscal woes is to rid ourselves of taxes on income. Anything less is just politics. I wish Mr. Long all the best, but at this point I couldn’t vote for him.
As Billy Long left the last round of big debates before the August primary, more and more people began asking the question. Is Billy Long qualified. More blogs came out examining if Billy Long is truly the best choice in Missouri 7. Many of those bloggers figured it out very quickly. Billy Long doesn't have the knowledge on issues and is not prepared to go to Congress even after more than a year and a half running for the job.
Anson Burlingame writes, Now for our prospective “citizen legislator”, Billy Long. That is the key point of his campaign that I have heard that sets him aside from his main opponents. He calls for term limited business men to represent us in Congress. That is not a bad idea in my mind IF those business men have a deep and abiding knowledge of government both at the levels of principles as well as specifics.
Billy has not shown me such knowledge. I won’t challenge him on his attempt to bring in new blood with an honest attempt to make a difference. But as such “new blood” there are some basic ingredients needed to sustain life, in this case the life of legislation for the good of all Americans, not just businessmen.
I also wonder exactly what political machine is behind Billy and how he got so much money to run the “richest” of the 8 campaigns for this seat. Not challenging him ethically, just wondering. I sent his headquarters an email asking to speak with someone on that and other issues and they have not bothered to get back in touch. Guess Joplin takes a back seat to his more important campaign in Springfield which is a political calculation that is his right to make.
Hey Anson, does it really set him apart considering Mike Moon, Jeff Wisdom, and Michael Wardell have never sat in an elected office either? It's funny that Billy Long's headquarters are keeping hush they are using James Harris and Jeff Roe to run their campaign. Jeff Roe loves to get dirty in races going as far as digging through garbage of political opponents as written many times on the internet. As for the "richest" of the campaign, Billy Long looks more like a career politician not only because of Roe and Harris, but also because he plays the same big money politics Americans are sick of.
In the first couple months of Long is Wrong, I also examined how weak and how contradictory Billy Long's actions have been on helping get a fairer tax system in the United States. Now Straight Up American makes many of the same points only to leave out Long's campaign contributions to candidates who wish to kill the Fair Tax like the Springfield mayor. Here's what Straight Up American writes:
Billy Long seems to be leading the pack of the Republican candidates so I decided to take a look at his position first. Mr. Long seems like a strong candidate in most respects, but unfortunately when it comes to the FairTax his position is a little weak and muddled. In his ads online and in print he indicates that he is in favor of “Fair Tax” (with the space between the two words). There’s a big difference between “Fair Tax” and the FairTax plan. Everyone claims to be in favor of “Fair Tax.” That is not specific support of the FairTax plan. In fact, Mr. Long’s stance on the issue of taxes states, “Billy is open to either a flat tax or a fair tax as a way to fix our tax system.”
This is like saying, “I’d be happy to take more poison or the antidote as a way to recovery.” The tax on income is the fundamental problem, and no amount of tinkering with it is going to fix it. Mr. Long’s openness to a flat tax indicates that he either doesn’t truly understand the problem, or he wants to ride the wave of support for the FairTax into a Congressional office.
I placed a call to the offices of ‘Billy Long for Congress’ to confirm his position on the issue, and was told that although his first choice would be the FairTax he is also open to a flat tax on income because of the difficulty of getting the FairTax passed. I’m sorry, but this is exactly the kind of wishy-washy stance we do not need in Washington.
There is no ‘either, or’ in the issue of tax reform. This Country will crumble under the weight and corruption of the income tax system, and we need representatives that understand that and are eager to fight for a new future. Accepting more of the same just because something is better than nothing isn’t going to cut it any longer. The only solution to our Country’s fiscal woes is to rid ourselves of taxes on income. Anything less is just politics. I wish Mr. Long all the best, but at this point I couldn’t vote for him.
Posted by
Bungalow Bill
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Clay, I am proud to have made your acquaintance, and also know you are a committed patriot who's not just messin' around! Thank you!" - Doug Burlison, Springfield, MO City Councilman
Bungalow Bill's Conservative Wisdom: As featured on Politico, The Daily Paul, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Drudge Report, Breitbart Big Government, Michael Savage, Western Front America, Newsmax, KY3, KSPR 33, KOLR 10, Alan Keyes is Loyal to Liberty, Lucianne, Infowars,Prison Planet, Speigel, Willie Nelson.com, Vincent David Jericho, Nick Reed, Truth About IB, and David Icke.com.
What's Right
-
-
-
-
Prayers For The Victims14 hours ago
-
-
An Honest Scientist!1 day ago
-
Another program gone while1 day ago
-
What the Hell America2 days ago
-
-
-
-
-
When Will The SHTF In The USA9 months ago
-
-
Blog Archive
- May 2013 (13)
- April 2013 (20)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (120)
- January 2013 (178)
- December 2012 (136)
- November 2012 (119)
- October 2012 (158)
- September 2012 (263)
- August 2012 (288)
- July 2012 (138)
- June 2012 (209)
- May 2012 (197)
- April 2012 (192)
- March 2012 (198)
- February 2012 (196)
- January 2012 (221)
- December 2011 (243)
- November 2011 (223)
- October 2011 (84)
- September 2011 (17)
- August 2011 (187)
- July 2011 (464)
- June 2011 (587)
- May 2011 (888)
- April 2011 (441)
- March 2011 (340)
- February 2011 (392)
- January 2011 (361)
- December 2010 (431)
- November 2010 (706)
- October 2010 (658)
- September 2010 (560)
- August 2010 (300)
- July 2010 (96)
- June 2010 (105)
- May 2010 (304)
- April 2010 (565)
- March 2010 (626)
- February 2010 (564)
- January 2010 (779)
- December 2009 (550)
- November 2009 (433)
- October 2009 (256)
- September 2009 (367)
- August 2009 (430)
- July 2009 (317)
- June 2009 (342)
- May 2009 (349)
- April 2009 (363)
- March 2009 (374)
- February 2009 (296)
- January 2009 (302)
- December 2008 (176)
- November 2008 (111)
- October 2008 (30)
One of Jeff Roe's tricks to help Billy Long is to run the message of another candidate's commercial in telephone calls and having these calls made multiple times to the same household.
ReplyDeleteRoe attempts to make the person receiving the call to harshly react to another candidate.
Roe is exactly what the white stuff in chicken poop is composed of, more chicken poop.
I have been getting a lot of Nodler calls at unusual hours....
ReplyDelete5:25
ReplyDeleteProof positive of the dirty tricks. Nothing can be done with no media coverage or a media that cares. Actually I do not believe the media has the capacity to pursue justice.
News-Leader proved it doesn't take much to impress them. Substance is sorely lacking.