Friday, April 30, 2010
What do Vitamins Have to do With Wall Street Reform?: Henry Waxman Puts Vitamin Regulation Amendment in Wall Street Bill
We already know the federal government wants more power over the nation’s food supply as well as your little garden. HR 875, the Food Safety Act pushes government power further into the our nation’s farms. When it comes to nutrition and the freedom to make choices for homeopathic treatment, the government now wants more say in what vitamins and supplements you put in your body. They are doing it secretly—not in the Food Safety Act, but in the Wall Street Reform bill.
Congressman Henry Waxman snuck an amendment into the House Version of the financial reform act that gives government more power over vitamins and supplements. Why would he use the Wall Street rhetoric to sneak the amendment into the bill?
As the government takes more power over our medical decisions, they look at the homeopathic medicine industry as one of their next targets. It’s no surprise to many people who understand nutrition know food today is being robbed of vital nutrients. As well, companies like Monsanto continue to experiment with genetically altered foods that produce their own insecticides that people are digesting, and the government seems to have little concern over the long-term effects on your health with these foods. As well, the government continues to put chemicals in food and water many fear are leading to other health issues. The nation’s vitamin and supplement industry offers alternatives to replace nutrition robbed from the great food experiment taking place in the nation’s Capital. With a growing concern over the health of food and water, the government now wants to get its greedy hands on another aspect of nutrition.
Waxman’s amendment gives the Federal Trade Commission more power over the vitamin and supplement industry. The FTC has long targeted the supplement business, but Waxman’s amendment may give them enough power to put many vitamin and supplement companies out of business by forcing them into the same red tape that drives up the costs of pharmaceutical production. Of course the difference is, the pharmaceutical companies produce chemicals that actually have long-effects on the body including death as noted in any Physician Desk Reference, and vitamins and supplements are made from natural ingredients that offer alternatives to pharmaceutical concoctions.
The FTC often attacks the claims of vitamin and supplement makers telling manufacturers they cannot make many of the claims they do. For instance, there are natural alternatives that balance a child’s brain chemistry through nutrition that don’t have the harsh effects on a child’s personality like Ritalin, Concerta, and Prozac. It’s controversial to even suggest something natural may have benefits and can be used as an alternative over these dangerous drugs they continue to push on children. I have plenty of friends who study nutrition, that understand the dangers of these drugs and realize many of the medical conditions we suffer from are simply from the lack of nutrition. Of course, it’s easier for the government to drug the population with mind altering drugs like Ritalin rather than offer real nutritional responsibility. Of course, they will attack McDonald’s Happy Meals while they carry out this deceit that continues to add children to the list of users of these mind altering drugs to give the illusion they care, all the while they let Monsanto genetically alter foods infusing seeds with insecticides.
Waxman’s amendment allows the Federal Trade Commission to write its own laws. Obama granted this similar power to the EPA, so the EPA can regulate carbon dioxide. This obviously would further the FTC’s war on homeopathic natural treatments and force more people to dangerous drugs. Read the PDA sometime if you don’t believe the drugs your doctors prescribe are not dangerous.
What's Right
-
-
-
-
Photo of the Day1 day ago
-
A North American Union? Really?2 days ago
-
-
OSLU Classes4 days ago
-
Has Our Government Gotten Too Large1 week ago
-
-
-
-
-
When Will The SHTF In The USA9 months ago
-
-
Blog Archive
- May 2013 (13)
- April 2013 (20)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (120)
- January 2013 (178)
- December 2012 (136)
- November 2012 (119)
- October 2012 (158)
- September 2012 (263)
- August 2012 (288)
- July 2012 (138)
- June 2012 (209)
- May 2012 (197)
- April 2012 (192)
- March 2012 (198)
- February 2012 (196)
- January 2012 (221)
- December 2011 (243)
- November 2011 (223)
- October 2011 (84)
- September 2011 (17)
- August 2011 (187)
- July 2011 (464)
- June 2011 (587)
- May 2011 (888)
- April 2011 (441)
- March 2011 (340)
- February 2011 (392)
- January 2011 (361)
- December 2010 (431)
- November 2010 (706)
- October 2010 (658)
- September 2010 (560)
- August 2010 (300)
- July 2010 (96)
- June 2010 (105)
- May 2010 (304)
- April 2010 (565)
- March 2010 (626)
- February 2010 (564)
- January 2010 (779)
- December 2009 (550)
- November 2009 (433)
- October 2009 (256)
- September 2009 (367)
- August 2009 (430)
- July 2009 (317)
- June 2009 (342)
- May 2009 (349)
- April 2009 (363)
- March 2009 (374)
- February 2009 (296)
- January 2009 (302)
- December 2008 (176)
- November 2008 (111)
- October 2008 (30)
Perfect case in point to demonstrate one of the greatest travesties in our Congressional system (after no term limits), that of horse trading to get a desired vote by attaching a totally unrelated aspect into a bill, forcing acceptance of a particular personally desired ruling if they want to get enough votes to pass what is considered a 'good' piece of legislation. Had the Bill of Rights amendments been handled in such a manner, we would probably be restricted from eating asparagus on Tuesday and dancing on Sunday.
ReplyDelete