Saturday, February 13, 2010
Obama a Marxist in College?: John C. Drew Sheds Light on Obama College Years

The Obama college years remain a black hole in Obama's past. We really don't know much about Obama's college years other than the first few college years were a blur of drug usage and partying.
Now a college professors who knew Obama in college is shedding some light on the Obama college years. Drugs may not be the only thing Obama dabbled with in college. The professor posted a blog and is conducted interviews on Obama's intrigue with Marxism.
This story isn't new. The mainstream media including Fox News ignored the story. Dr. John C. Drew claims he was a Marxist as well when he enrolled in college himself.
Drew had an encounter with Obama to specifically discuss Marxism. He was dating a girl who knew Barack Obama. His girlfriend came home one day excited wanting Drew to meet this man, knowing their philosophical views were similar. They eventually went out to dinner, drinks, partied, and discussed each other's Marxist views. Drew discusses more about the conversation in the video interview below.
Drew describes himself as a serious Marxist, including being an enemy of the US government, while he was in college. When they met, Drew describes Obama's views were parallel with Drew's views. He was one of the brotherhood, ready for revolution. Obama wasn't just an explorer of intellectual Marxism. He embraced Marxist Leninism.
Drew says Obama was in 100% agreement with his Marxist professors in college. He looked forward to a revolution in this country to overturn the power structure. This is a fascinating interview, because we may be seeing those revolutionary efforts engaged in front of us as Obama's policies appear to be dooming the country more than helping.
Drew has a Communist radar like gay men have gaydar. He has no doubt that Obama was a hard-core Marxist in college. I don't think this comes to any surprise as we have watched Obama wiggle around the Socialist label, while his critics have gone as far as equating socialism to racism. Of course Obama is working to give the power to the state by creating more dependency on the central government. This interview will further confirm what most of us suspect. Obama's roots are placed in the Communist Manifesto and other radical documents like Rules for Radicals--which is socialist/communist propaganda.
Posted by
Bungalow Bill
Labels:
Communism,
John C. Drew,
Obama
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Clay, I am proud to have made your acquaintance, and also know you are a committed patriot who's not just messin' around! Thank you!" - Doug Burlison, Springfield, MO City Councilman
Bungalow Bill's Conservative Wisdom: As featured on Politico, The Daily Paul, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Drudge Report, Breitbart Big Government, Michael Savage, Western Front America, Newsmax, KY3, KSPR 33, KOLR 10, Alan Keyes is Loyal to Liberty, Lucianne, Infowars,Prison Planet, Speigel, Willie Nelson.com, Vincent David Jericho, Nick Reed, Truth About IB, and David Icke.com.
What's Right
-
-
-
-
Prayers For The Victims9 hours ago
-
-
An Honest Scientist!1 day ago
-
Another program gone while1 day ago
-
What the Hell America2 days ago
-
-
-
-
-
When Will The SHTF In The USA9 months ago
-
-
Blog Archive
- May 2013 (13)
- April 2013 (20)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (120)
- January 2013 (178)
- December 2012 (136)
- November 2012 (119)
- October 2012 (158)
- September 2012 (263)
- August 2012 (288)
- July 2012 (138)
- June 2012 (209)
- May 2012 (197)
- April 2012 (192)
- March 2012 (198)
- February 2012 (196)
- January 2012 (221)
- December 2011 (243)
- November 2011 (223)
- October 2011 (84)
- September 2011 (17)
- August 2011 (187)
- July 2011 (464)
- June 2011 (587)
- May 2011 (888)
- April 2011 (441)
- March 2011 (340)
- February 2011 (392)
- January 2011 (361)
- December 2010 (431)
- November 2010 (706)
- October 2010 (658)
- September 2010 (560)
- August 2010 (300)
- July 2010 (96)
- June 2010 (105)
- May 2010 (304)
- April 2010 (565)
- March 2010 (626)
- February 2010 (564)
- January 2010 (779)
- December 2009 (550)
- November 2009 (433)
- October 2009 (256)
- September 2009 (367)
- August 2009 (430)
- July 2009 (317)
- June 2009 (342)
- May 2009 (349)
- April 2009 (363)
- March 2009 (374)
- February 2009 (296)
- January 2009 (302)
- December 2008 (176)
- November 2008 (111)
- October 2008 (30)
Great Find! A very interesting interview!
ReplyDeleteI already posted the article by Newsmax and will repost this video with a linky.
None of this surprises me. The insanity is that the main stream media has ignored Obama's past.
ReplyDeleteBTW, I'd like to know more about Obama's membership in "The New Party" prior to his joining the dimocrat party (to cover his true beliefs).
Obamadinga is da man.
ReplyDeleteWhat college were they attending?
ReplyDeleteOccidental College in Los Angeles
ReplyDeleteYou didn't think they called him Dear Leader Maobama for nothing, did you?
ReplyDelete"The insanity is that the main stream media has ignored Obama's past.'
ReplyDeleteYep; a perfect example of "noble savage" syndrome - and inside America!
This is an interesting article. It confirms what I've thought all along about the current occupant at 1600 PA ave. First time visitor, came your way via link at Crusader Rabbit. Thinking about cross posting this on my blog TOTUS with link back of course!
ReplyDeleteI knew some of this, as well as many of his associates, before the election because I cared enough to know a candidate BEFORE the election rather than after.
ReplyDeleteNow there is info that he may have had his degree and transcripts at Columbia bought and paid for while he was in Pakistan when he was suppose to be at Columbia, that enabled him to enter Harvard.
Info by Percy Sutton stated that Obama's Harvard education was paid for by Khalid Al Mansour.
Why doesn't some eager Reporter put all this together in one sock and win a Pulitzer?
Is he more or less Marxist than the MSM??
ReplyDeletePatriotKY...''Reporters'' will never investigate Obama because those in the MSM have a vested interest in his succeeding. ''He'' is in fact, one of them politically. Wasn't it Chrissy Matthews who said that his(matthews) job was to help Obama succeed?
ReplyDeleteThe media had ample warnings and time to vette Barry and that includes FOX.
Elections have consequences...
Enlightening, informative...all that we suspected now confirmed.
ReplyDeleteI almost asked myself why I'm not surprised, but then I remembered that I'm uh, not surprised!
ReplyDeleteYou know what they say, if your not a liberal when your young you have no heart, and if your not a conservative when your old you have no brains. Given that Obama just proposed slashing NASA's budget and turning it over to the private sector, I'd say he must have a heart and brains.
ReplyDeleteRemember Ronald Reagan was a liberal at one time.
I thought the Obama haters were suspect of him because his records were gone and no one could remember him at college. Now instead of saying 'oh we were wrong, someone does remember him', they say, 'see I told ya so, he's a commie'. Almost everyone is a raging liberal in college, gimme a break.
@ anonymous
ReplyDeleteI can see why you left your name off of this. NASA has become Obama's arm to produce global warming rhetoric. It's so far off its original mission right now, and in case you don't know, green is the new red.
There is a huge difference between being a liberal in college and being a committed communist in college.
I left my name off cause I don't have an account here so I don't have a 'name'. Since when do conservatives distinguish between commie and liberal anyways? Obama wants to turn space flight over to the private sector, so where is your response to that? You should support it. Just like you should support his Medicare cuts. But no, you won't, because your more concerned with bashing Obama than being intellectually honest. Fake conservative 'republicans' in the house moan and groan about Obama's proposed Medicare cuts and NASA cuts. To republicans, government spending is good when it goes to people who vote for them, bad when it goes elsewhere. I find that hypocritical.
ReplyDeleteDo a search and you will find I am an advocate of allowing private corporations to explore space. However, I don't agree with the government continuing to use taxpayers money to fund a corrupted science. NASA was tied to the Hadley CRU global warming temperature fixes.
ReplyDeleteWhat amazes me about your further comment is all the times Obama says he will do something and then does something completely opposite. Just like days after he calls for a new tone, there are plenty of examples in both the White House and Congress what this new tone is.
Oh, sure the rhetoric sounds wonderful, but actions... That's a different story. Obama promises a lot to pander to many, but fails to deliver on anything unless it directly benefits his radical philosophies.
As well, this interview isn't simply a read through the Communist Manifesto and going through a phase. This is actually believing the rhetoric, as Obama's friend claims Obama wants a revolution.
Right above the anonymous option are the words name and URL, so you don't have to register.
Thanks for pointing that out, I'm happy to use my name.
ReplyDeleteI believed lots of things in college I no longer believe, as do most Americans.
Again, Ronald Reagan is a good example.
I think the idea that Obama is a secret commie is ridiculous simply because anyone with half a brain knows that communism does not work, and frankly, Obama is too smart to be a commie. Is he a liberal? Of course.
When your 18 years old and looking to rebel against everything, communism might sound good on paper, you might embrace it. After you've lived a bit and read a bit of history, you realize that communism only sounds good on paper and would never work as intended. Basically, anyone who believes in communism is too dumb to ever become president, which Obama did, so he can't be communist, because he's not that dumb.
Obama is too smart to be a commie. Is this really your argument? Obviously, when we are paying hundreds of billions of dollars in interest to the Communist Chinese because Obama is setting to double or triple the federal deficit within ten years to create socialism in the United States, will you claim you defended Obama's intelligence as our country is bankrupt.
ReplyDeleteAnyone with half a brain knows you can't keep your house in order if you are going to continue borrowing money. Obama obviously hasn't learned this as his federal budget he presented is over $3 trillion in spending.
I don't have the confidence in his intelligence that you do.
Obama is either smart and willfully ignorant or is dumb and some person is pulling his strings behind the scenes. He seems to be doing the exact opposite as what needs to be done to fix the economy.
ReplyDelete@Mike I don't know how entrenched in your beliefs you were in college or whether you just kind of went around with the crowd and believed in liberalism just cause it was the cool thing to do or not, but Obama was brought up on Communism and his grandparents had communist friends and that can lay seeds in a person's mind, in a big way while growing up. By evidenced today and how he surrounds himself with radicals, it seems as though Obama was much more than just some person going along with the times but rather he was entrenched in the communist way-of-life.
@Mike Ramon:
ReplyDeleteI think the idea that Obama is a secret commie is ridiculous simply because anyone with half a brain knows that communism does not work, and frankly, Obama is too smart to be a commie.
So all the Marxist professors -- who have actual PhDs, not JDs like Obama -- don't have half a brain? You do realize that many professors at Ivy League and other prestigious liberal arts colleges and major universities are self-described Marxists and communists. Right?
That fact undermines your whole argument, doesn't it?
I hate to break it to you Bill but the defecit numbers would have been what they are today no matter who was elected. The housing market would still have collapsed, we'd still be stuck in 2 wars, and a whole bunch of people would still be out of a job. The fact of the matter is that Obama inherited a mess, a huge mess. Bush inherited a surplus. If you think things would be different if McCain were elected your only fooling yourself.
ReplyDeleteAs far as China goes, yes they buy are debt, but why? Because they are nice and want to help America out? Heck no. They need us to buy their 'made in china' crap or they will cease growing. They are utterly dependent on America, if we fail, then they do as well. We are, because of our economic ties, mutually dependent. Sort of like the cold war where war was avoided due to the prospect of mutual nuclear destruction. Should we be dependent on China? I sure as heck don't think so, but poiticians on both sides of the isle think free trade is more important than national security. We owe China so much money because many Americans like to buy cheap consumer goods from Wal-Mart, most of which says 'Made In China'. You can't blame Obama for that.
@Mike,
ReplyDeleteYou can't make the claim that no matter who was elected the debt would be the same. Obama's stimulus package an the Omnibus spending package are two examples of how Obama increased the debt, and you can't make that claim with the unknown of how another person may have handled the issue. That's just silly.
It has nothing to do with paying it back to the Chinese. It's meeting the interest payments that's the problem.
Most of the debt is the result of spending programs already in place that 'kick-in' during recessions (e.g. unemployment insurance), not the result of the 'extras' in the spending bill. The debt would still be in the 3 trillion dollar range even if Ronald Reagan came back from the dead and was elected.
ReplyDeleteConstitutional Law 101: the congress holds the power of the purse, not the president.
Democrats and Republicans alike were happy to put their pork in the spending bill. And yes, Obama signed the bill into law, but he didn't have much choice since it was more important to pass something as opposed to nothing.
Another big contributor to the current debt was the Republicans Medicare drug benefit which they failed to fund. Just like they failed to fund the wars in the regular budget.
You don't need to teach the Constitution to me. I am aware of who holds the purse; however, it's Obama's agenda that has increased the debt, and he does propose a budget for Congress to debate.
ReplyDelete'Obama signed the bill into law, but he didn't have much choice since it was important to pass something as opposed to nothing.'
Why is government responsible for the American economy, especially when it's based on a FREE Market. Government needs to get out of the way, but this he had to pass something argument has no merit whatsoever. Since you want to talk about Constitution 101, most of the federal spending in unconstitutional in the first place according to the 18 enumerated powers.
You are talking about a national debt the Democrats just voted to expand to $14.3 trillion, which was $10.1 trillion when Obama took the reigns, and you are simplifying it down to a Medicare program?
Then you bring up unemployment. How many times has Obama and the Democratic Congress expanded jobless claims, and there was a bill in Congress again to expand jobless claims. You are oversimplifying this in hopes of keeping Obama's hands clean.
Surprise, surprise? His parents and grandparents were communists. His mentor in Hawaii was Frank Marshall Davis, a card-carrying activist. He hung out with members of the Weather Underground and the SDS. He expounded Saul Alinsky as a teacher. All this and more was known before the election, but hidden or ignored by the press. A democracy depends on a free and responsible press.
ReplyDeleteI think it's time that Republicans finally get over losing the election last year. It's time to move past it and grow up.
ReplyDeleteThis certainly tracks with everything else we know about Obama's associations and political heritage. If he were given a free hand to revolutionize American society and government, what do you think it would look like? The only things holding him back right now are the political realities and public awareness. To me, he has zero charisma anymore. I fear his ability to channel the energy of the socialist, angry, progressive legions.
ReplyDeleteThe problem is not that he used to be a marxist in college, but that he isn't any longer
ReplyDeleteWho still thinks the man is smart? He does not how many states we have and he thinks the earthquake happened in Hawaii. He needs a teleprompter to talk to grade schoolers and you people think this is smart. Much more like an educated idiot for sure. I shudder to think what he may be telling other leaders without his teleprompter. He is nothing but a bully with a slick tongue.
ReplyDeleteHe is a marxist
ReplyDeleteDo you have any actual writings, audio or video, or just a guy without verifiable credentials on a podcast?
ReplyDeleteWhat a chatty kathy this interviewer is!
ReplyDeleteIf it walks like a duck and talks like a duck?
ReplyDeleteI really like your post you done a great jobs . Thanks for sharing valuable information.
ReplyDeleteflights to pakistan
Why should we consider Dr. John C. Drew--who was supposedly a hard-core Marxist until 1984--a credible source?
ReplyDelete"There's nothing worse," as they say, "than a reformed..."
Well, I suppose that word wouldn't be deemed politically correct by gentle conservative readers. But you can surely fill in the blank.
A great many intelligent and inquisitive young minds become enthused and energized when they initially encounter non-mainstream systems of thought during their college years. Most often this doesn't result in total indoctrination. Most often it results in a broader understanding of the world. It gives one an increased ability to think outside the box.
This kind of information is very limited on internet. Nice to find the post related to my searching criteria. Your updated and informative post will be appreciated by blog loving people.
ReplyDeleteHelp in SEO
The Leader Of The Regime was a communist in 1980. He still is a communist in mid-September 2011, as evidenced by his communist statements in the run up to His Immaculation and as evidenced by his mid-September class warfare rhetoric in the run-up to the 2012 elections.
ReplyDeleteJohn Drew exaggerates and outright lies about what he knows or thinks he knows about Obama. For all his anti-government position, Drew published a pamphlet telling people how to access US Government money and become a consultant at US Government expense, which he is and does. In the last 2 years, Drew has been a schill for the Tea Baggers and the Republican Party and constantly publishing in the NYT blog how his wife could not find a job because of Obama and the Democrats in Congress. He repeated this ad naeseum. Then, all of a sudden, once the Republicans came into power in the 2010 elections, his wife miraculously no longer was unemployed or needed a job. Drew just keeps exaggerating and lying not only about Obama but about the alleged Armenian massacre in 1915 in Turkey. What Drew won’t tell you is that many Armenians were terrorists and plotting to overthrow the Ottoman government. I worked in Yerevan from 2006 to 2010 and the Armenians are a people not to be trusted.
ReplyDelete