Rules for Scientific Radicals: Hadley CRU Scientists Play by Obama's Rules

Most logical people would at least inquire if they were suspect of being taken for fraud. Not Barack Obama according to Robert Gibbs. The answer why is simple. Barack Obama is part of the fraud that looks to separate tax payers from billions of dollars. He has no time to look at Hadley CRU as being anything but an inconvenience to his agenda.

That's why, despite all the doubts now cast about the ethics of politically motivated global warming and all the scams surrounding it, Obama had Robert Gibbs continue the course with the Al Gore Answer.

The debate is over sound bite Al Gore sound bites

Of course, Robert Gibbs didn't say it exactly like that. Here's what Gibbs said, "I don't think that's anything that is, quite frankly, among most people, in dispute anymore." This is even after there are thousands of scientists who now question the man-made global warming theory, and after numerous e-mails from Hadley CRU point to taking climate skeptics out of the peer review process. That's something Obama, Gibbs, and Gore don't want you to know though. They all stand to lose too much power and money from this controversy surrounding Hadley CRU.

Gibbs went on to say, "I think there's no real scientific basis for the dispute of this," responded Gibbs to questions about those scientists' credibility.

Let me put this as blunt as possible, when your White House follows a similar playbook as the scientists at Hadley CRU, with similar plays like intimidation, of course you are going to be blinded by the corruption. The Hadley CRU scientists were basically using an altered, scientific edition of Saul Alinksy's Rules for Radicals. For Gibbs to question the credibility of the scientists would be in essence Gibbs questioning the credibility of Obama--they play by the same rules of silencing your enemies using intimidation.

As far as Gibbs is concerned, this is just another day at the White House. Nothing new here. Move along.