Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Ted Kennedy, the KGB, and the Soviet's Plot Against Ronald Reagan: The KGB's Ted Kennedy Letter
Little is being said today about Ted Kennedy’s attempts to shape foreign policy with the USSR against the wishes of President Reagan and his administration. Kennedy went out of his way to contact Soviet officials and build Reagan into a nuclear cowboy ready to attack the Soviet Union at moment’s notice. Kennedy was proven wrong as Reagan’s peace through strength approach made the world a safer place and eventually led to the fall of the Berlin Wall. With egg on his face, he declared Reagan "the President who won the cold war" after Reagan's death.
If Kennedy was elected president in 1980, we would have continued down the path of failed policies of giving in to the Soviet Union which always led to the spread of communism. The Berlin Wall would surely stand today had Kennedy been elected in 1980.
As KGB documents were released after the fall of the Soviet Union, a letter showed that Kennedy was a traitor of the United States during the Reagan administration. He wanted the help of the Soviet Union to defeat Reagan's policies. He played a very dangerous game that more than likely increased tensions, all designed for political gain the following year as Reagan ran for reelection. Kennedy’s contacts with the KGB and other Soviet Officials should have been considered treason. They were obviously against the policies of the State Department. Here is the letter from 1983:
Special Importance Committee on State Security of the USSR 14.05.1983 No. 1029 Ch/OV Moscow
Regarding Senator Kennedy’s request to the General Secretary of the Communist Party Comrade Y.V. Andropov Comrade Y.V. Andropov
On 9-10 May of this year, Senator Edward Kennedy’s close friend and trusted confidant J. Tunney was in Moscow. The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov:
Senator Kennedy, like other rational people, is very troubled by the current state of Soviet-American relations. Events are developing such that this relationship coupled with the general state of global affairs will make the situation even more dangerous. The main reason for this is Reagan’s belligerence, and his firm commitment to deploy new American middle range nuclear weapons within Western Europe.
According to Kennedy, the current threat is due to the President’s refusal to engage any modification on his politics. He feels that his domestic standing has been strengthened because of the well publicized improvements of the economy: inflation has been greatly reduced, production levels are increasing as is overall business activity. For these reasons, interest rates will continue to decline. The White House has portrayed this in the media as the “success of Reaganomics.”
Naturally, not everything in the province of economics has gone according to Reagan’s plan. A few well known economists and members of financial circles, particularly from the north-eastern states, foresee certain hidden tendencies that may bring about a new economic crisis in the USA. This could bring about the fall of the presidential campaign of 1984, which would benefit the Democratic party. Nevertheless, there are no secure assurances this will indeed develop.
The only real potential threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations. These issues, according to the senator, will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign. The movement advocating a freeze on nuclear arsenals of both countries continues to gain strength in the United States. The movement is also willing to accept preparations, particularly from Kennedy, for its continued growth. In political and influential circles of the country, including within Congress, the resistance to growing military expenditures is gaining strength.
However, according to Kennedy, the opposition to Reagan is still very weak. Reagan’s adversaries are divided and the presentations they make are not fully effective. Meanwhile, Reagan has the capabilities to effectively counter any propaganda. In order to neutralize criticism that the talks between the USA and the USSR are non-constructive, Reagan will grandiose, but subjectively propagandistic. At the same time, Soviet officials who speak about disarmament will be quoted out of context, silenced or groundlessly and whimsically discounted. Although arguments and statements by officials of the USSR do appear in the press, it is important to note the majority of Americans do not read serious newspapers or periodicals.
Kennedy believes that, given the current state of affairs, and in the interest of peace, it would be prudent and timely to undertake the following steps to counter the militaristic politics of Reagan and his campaign to psychologically burden the American people. In this regard, he offers the following proposals to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Y.V. Andropov.
1. Kennedy asks Y.V. Andropov to consider inviting the senator to Moscow for a personal meeting in July of this year. The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA. He would also like to inform you that he has planned a trip through Western Europe, where he anticipates meeting England’s Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and French President Mitterand in which he will exchange similar ideas regarding the same issues.
If his proposals would be accepted in principle, Kennedy would send his representative to Moscow to resolve questions regarding organizing such a visit.
Kennedy thinks the benefit of a meeting with Y.V. Andropov will be enhanced if he could also invite one of the well known Republican senators, for example, Mark Hatfield. Such a meeting will have a strong impact on American and political circles in the USA. (In March of 1982, Hatfield and Kennedy proposed a project resolution to freeze the nuclear arsenals of the USA and the USSR and published a book on this theme as well.)
2. Kennedy believes that in order to influence Americans it would be important to organize in August-September of this year, televised interviews with Y.V. Andropov in the USA. A direct appeal by the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union to the American people will, without a doubt, attract a great deal of attention and interest in the country. The senator is convinced this would receive the maximum resonance in so far as television is the most effective method of mass media and information.
If the proposal is recognized as worthy, then Kennedy and his friends will bring about suitable steps to have representatives of the largest television companies in the USA contact Y.V. Andropov for an invitation to Moscow for the interviews. Specifically, the president of the board of directors of ABC, Elton Raul and television columnists Walter Cronkite or Barbara Walters could visit Moscow. The senator underlined the importance that this initiative should be seen as coming from the American side.
Furthermore, with the same purpose in mind, a series of televised interviews in the USA with lower level Soviet officials, particularly from the military would be organized. They would also have an opportunity to appeal directly to the American people about the peaceful intentions of the USSR, with their own arguments about maintaining a true balance of power between the USSR and the USA in military terms. This issue is quickly being distorted by Reagan’s administration.
Kennedy asked to convey that this appeal to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union is his effort to contribute a strong proposal that would root out the threat of nuclear war, and to improve Soviet-American relations, so that they define the safety of the world. Kennedy is very impressed with the activities of Y.V. Andropov and other Soviet leaders, who expressed their commitment to heal international affairs, and improve mutual understanding between peoples.
The senator underscored that he eagerly awaits a reply to his appeal, the answer to which may be delivered through Tunney.
Having conveyed Kennedy’s appeal to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Tunney also explained that Senator Kennedy has in the last few years actively made appearances to reduce the threat of war. Because he formally refused to partake in the election campaign of 1984, his speeches would be taken without prejudice as they are not tied to any campaign promises. Tunney remarked that the senator wants to run for president in 1988. At that time, he will be 56 and his personal problems, which could hinder his standing, will be resolved (Kennedy has just completed a divorce and plans to remarry in the near future). Taken together, Kennedy does not discount that during the 1984 campaign, the Democratic party may officially turn to him to lead the fight against the Republicans and elect their candidate president. This would explain why he is convinced that none of the candidates today have a real chance at defeating Reagan.
We await instructions.
President of the committee V. Chebrikov
Why is it I get the feeling that if old Kennedy was still alive today and a Republican Senator decided to go against the wishes of Obama and his Cabinet and secretly request meetings with enemies of the United States, Teddy would be the first one to cry foul? Because that's the kind of guy Ted Kennedy was; after all, these were the same Soviets that made his brother John F. Kennedy a hero during the Bay of Pigs. Amazing he would turn the cheek after the near disaster his own brother faced and plot against his own country for political gain. Ted Kennedy was always looking out for himself from Chappaquiddick to the last letter to the state government of Massachusetts.
What's Right
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I am Breitbarticus on Huffpo15 hours ago
-
-
Super Tuesday...20 hours ago
-
How To Make A Bug Out Bag1 day ago
-
-
-
-
-
Cartoons from the UK...4 weeks ago
-
Lunch Links - 2/6/124 weeks ago
-
-
-
Set Principles First8 months ago
-
Blog Archive
- March 2012 (62)
- February 2012 (196)
- January 2012 (221)
- December 2011 (243)
- November 2011 (223)
- October 2011 (84)
- September 2011 (17)
- August 2011 (187)
- July 2011 (464)
- June 2011 (587)
- May 2011 (888)
- April 2011 (442)
- March 2011 (340)
- February 2011 (392)
- January 2011 (361)
- December 2010 (431)
- November 2010 (706)
- October 2010 (658)
- September 2010 (560)
- August 2010 (300)
- July 2010 (96)
- June 2010 (105)
- May 2010 (304)
- April 2010 (565)
- March 2010 (626)
- February 2010 (564)
- January 2010 (779)
- December 2009 (550)
- November 2009 (433)
- October 2009 (256)
- September 2009 (367)
- August 2009 (430)
- July 2009 (317)
- June 2009 (342)
- May 2009 (349)
- April 2009 (363)
- March 2009 (374)
- February 2009 (296)
- January 2009 (302)
- December 2008 (176)
- November 2008 (111)
- October 2008 (30)
brilliant !
ReplyDeleteIf you are referring to Ronald Reagan, you are correct. Brilliant!
ReplyDeleteBy the way, did you notice something in this letter. It states, "He (Kennedy) feels that his domestic standing has been strengthened because of the well publicized improvements of the economy: inflation has been greatly reduced, production levels are increasing as is overall business activity."
What? You mean Ted Kennedy was worried about Reagan's reelection chances because Reaganomics, which was based on cutting taxes and reducing government waste was working? That's like admitting Obama is doing the wrong thing, since it's fundamentally the opposite of what Reagan did. The dishonesty of the American left shines in this letter.
This is incredible stuff, Clay. It deserves some love on the innertubes.
ReplyDeleteAh, the ubercorrupt super lying control freak frauds, drugs, alchohol, money, power, status and sex driven Kennedy crime family. Thus the greatest heroes of Marxist sodden Democrat left liberals. Read The Dark Side of Camelot by Seymour M. Hersh. Thanks for this little amzing gem. Ted should have been hung for treason. Sadly he didn't drown. Colonel Robert Neville blogspoit com. Rtd [from blogging.]
ReplyDeleteHey, look, this is typical liberal behavior, isn't it? After all, didn't the new president contact the Iraqi leaders BEFORE he had even won the freakin' election requesting that they NOT deal with the sitting administration?
ReplyDeleteANYONE who contacts other world leaders in an effort to undermine a sitting administration should be considered acting in a treasonous manner. Instead, the left acts like it's their RIGHT to go behind the back of a sitting president. It's WRONG.
But hey, the left of this country has never looked at right and wrong. They are more concerned with their own power. Can you imagine if Bush had created his own gestapo for terrorist interrogation answerable only to the White House? There would be calls for impeachment and everything else. But because this guy does it, it's supposed to be a great idea.
As one of those people that falls into the new Homeland Security director's definition of a domestic terrorist, this new gang makes me a little nervous. After all, they've not made it clear whether this unit will interrogate only overseas terror suspects. How long before those inside this country who fit this new definition of "terrorist" get a visit by the new unit?
This, and the above mentioned behavior by the now much beloved Sen. Kennedy is evidence of just how arrogant and convinced of their own wonderfulness the left of this country is. It SHOULD be a wake up call for the people, but, somehow, I doubt it will be.
Really, what do you expect? When his father, Joseph senior, was Ambassador to England in WW-2, (appointed by FDR) he was "recalled" (fired) by FDR because of his openly sympathetic Nazi views. If not for the family wealth Joseph senior accumulated from running whiskey during prohibition, they'd have been just another Irish family living in Massachussetts. Who says crime doesn't pay?
ReplyDeleteKennedy is dead, so what ? He was just another lying piece of crap. His judgement will be in front of God. Hope he had a " stiff drink " just before he died. He will need it.
ReplyDeleteGood riddance.